1. Role of Reviewers
Reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the quality, integrity, and scientific value of published research in TIMEWELL PRESS journals.
As a reviewer, you are expected to provide fair, constructive, and timely evaluations of submitted manuscripts.
2. Review Principles
All reviews should follow these principles:
- Confidentiality — Manuscripts must not be shared or discussed externally
- Objectivity — Reviews must be based on academic merit only
- Constructiveness — Provide clear, helpful feedback for improvement
- Timeliness — Complete reviews within the assigned timeframe
- Impartiality — Declare any conflicts of interest
3. Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers should evaluate manuscripts based on:
1. Originality
- Is the research novel and significant?
2. Methodology
- Are the methods appropriate and clearly explained?
3. Results & Analysis
- Are findings valid, reliable, and well-supported?
4. Contribution
- Does the paper contribute to the field?
5. Clarity
- Is the manuscript clearly written and well-structured?
4. Review Structure
A standard review should include:
- Summary of the manuscript
- Major comments
- Minor comments
- Recommendation:
- Accept
- Minor revision
- Major revision
- Reject
5. Ethics & Responsibility
Reviewers must adhere to strict ethical standards:
- Do not use unpublished data for personal advantage
- Do not contact authors directly
- Do not delegate reviews without permission
- Report any ethical concerns to the editor
TIMEWELL PRESS follows international peer review ethics consistent with COPE guidelines.
6. Review Timeline
- Standard review period: 2–4 weeks
- Extensions may be granted upon request
- Delayed reviews should be communicated to the editorial office